But
different cultures have different ideas about what is right and wrong regarding
sex. The ultimate example may well be Mohammed, the founder of Islam, who
married a six-year old girl named Aisha and consummated the marriage only a few
years later. To Western thinking, influenced as it has been by Judeo-Christian
morality, this is abhorrent in the extreme, yet no Muslim would dare accuse
their prophet of wrong-doing in this regard.
In the book
of Genesis, it must be admitted that standards of sexual morality were not yet
fully evolved or defined. Chapter 34 depicts a horrendous clash of cultures
over the issue of sexual morality.
Jacob’s
daughter, Dinah, innocently ventures out to meet other young women in her new
neighborhood. The son of the region’s prince,
a young man named Shechem, falls in love with her and, in modern terminology,
rapes her. Surprisingly, though, the
writer of Genesis paints Shechem as a decent, honourable young man - v19
literally states that he was “more honourable than all the household of his
father”!
Jacob doesn’t
know how to handle this situation.
Having made every effort to befriend the men of the area, he doesn’t
want to cause trouble. But two of his
sons, Simeon and Levi, devise a (brilliantly) deceitful plot to avenge their
sister. They end up murdering Shechem,
his father the prince, and all the other males in the city! Then, with the help of the other brothers,
they plunder the city, taking captive all the girls and women!
I would have
thought this was a bit extreme. But when
Jacob challenged his sons, they simply said: "Should he treat our sister
like a harlot?"
We are led
to believe that Shechem honestly didn’t think he had sinned in defiling
Dinah. There is absolutely no evidence
that he thought of her as a harlot. In
fact, he desperately wanted to marry her.
In his culture, he was a good man.
But he fell foul of a culture clash with a group of men who apparently
believed that the rape of one sister was so reprehensible that it warranted the
murder and plunder of a whole city.
There is no
mention in this story of Dinah’s feelings.
Our modern sensibilities, like those of her brothers, are outraged. But, from her perspective, things may have
been rather different. She might not
have been so outraged. Shechem loved her
and would undoubtedly have given her a good life. There are many instances in Scripture of
women learning to adapt to marital circumstances that, today, we would find
objectionable.
So what’s my
point? Just this. Sexual morality in the Bible is a gradually
unfolding thing. After Genesis 2, the
ideal of one man, one woman marriage doesn’t really reappear until the New Testament
and the teachings of Jesus. It is common
for Old Testament heroes to have more than one wife, often treating them as
commodities or possessions.
We affirm
that sex outside of marriage is wrong but we cannot back this up from the Old
Testament. Even the laws of Moses make
provision for polygamy (Ex 21:10) and rape in the case of an unbetrothed virgin
(Deut 22:28,29).
The
Christian view of sexual morality is based primarily on the teachings of Jesus
and the later epistles. Our standards
are part of Christian culture, which I think are easily defensible as the best and
highest culture in this regard. But
people whose culture puts them outside the people of God in Christ have
different standards. And this is what we
see around us today.
Can we allow
this to challenge our thinking and attitudes?
Shechem would not have understood the sexual morality of Jacob’s family
because his culture was different.
Likewise, there is no point in Christians castigating (let alone trying
to punish) non-Christian people for their sexual immorality if we have not
attempted to demonstrate why our cultural perspective on sex is better and more
honourable than theirs.
I believe
that, increasingly, Christians will be called upon to defend their moral
positions in a world of competing cultures.
But mere ranting and raving will not help. There are many Shechems who simply don’t know
any better. How would Shechem and his
people have reacted if Jacob and his sons had carefully explained their
standards? The evidence of Genesis 34
suggests that they would have adapted their culture to accommodate Israel.
It was a
cultural clash matter back then and it’s a cultural clash matter now.
No comments:
Post a Comment